The DAO and the Dao – Finding a Path to Govern the World

 By David Gallup

The most important issue facing the world today is the lack of a globally coordinated political system to deal with the simultaneous and compounding threats of nuclear war, injustice, global health, and climate destruction.

The 200 or so separate nation-states cannot adequately handle global problems that transcend national borders. People lose faith in government when global problems affect them locally. Due to government inaction, more and more people face vulnerable situations such as displacement by war and climate destruction. Too much power in central authorities of national governments, without world governmental structures, has led to the loss of their legitimacy.

What kind of holistic and ethical governing system can realign government to distribute the power of discussion, decision-making, and voting among the people of the world?

We can find a path toward a governed world through a federation of decentralized public-run organizations such as Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs). Decentralized autonomous organizations guided by the Dao – a universal interconnectedness – can serve as the ethical system we need to unite and govern humanity.

First, let’s consider the usefulness and power of DAOs

A decentralized autonomous organization (DAO) is a human-created organization that functions without a central authority controlling the decision-making process. Members or “citizens” of a DAO vote according to mutually-agreed-upon rules using secure digital procedures. Their vote is stored on a permanent ledger or record (blockchain). Members oftentimes receive rewards for their work on behalf of the entire group and for interacting peacefully. Rewards can come in the form of cryptocurrencies and investment in or partial ownership of an application, digital property, or real-world objective for establishing the DAO. Decentralized autonomous organizations provide incentives for members to increase their participation and constructive activism in achieving the purposes of the organizations.

DAOs have the potential to prevent manipulation of data, control by one interested party or lobbyist, and interference by government authorities and bad actors. DAOs have the potential to democratize how humans interact online, empower groups of individuals to achieve their goals more efficiently, and support the distribution of the benefits to the whole group. DAOs can provide interactions that are transparent, trustworthy, rights-affirming, and equitable.

How could DAOs assist us in governing the world?

Decentralized autonomous organizations already provide secure and democratized structures for groups of people united in a common goal or financial project. According to Forbes Magazine, there are more than 4,000 DAOs, and this number is accelerating. “CityDAO” is an example of a DAO created to democratize control over real estate. The DAO provides ownership and governance of a parcel of land. Another DAO “LexDAO” seeks to democratize law, making access to justice more efficient and inclusive. Section 1.2 of their LexDAO constitution states, “…If legal services were easier to use, verify, and enforce, we could live in a fairer world.”

The democratization factor makes DAOs an important consideration in finding a path to govern the world. DAOs can provide governing structures for people to interact with each other, without the constant need for a central authority. Then, if necessary for effective achievement of larger goals, they can vote to create or fund a central entity to conduct certain tasks for them. DAOs can help to ensure that government is based on consent, decision-making through voting by all participants in the DAO.

DAOs may be the future of global direct democracy. Decentralized autonomous organizations established for governing can provide a tool for people to discuss issues important to their communities. Each community can establish their own DAO running on solar and other sustainable power. Online, community members can discuss various proposals and then vote on them, ultimately deciding which proposals to support politically and financially. DAOs can provide a digital venue where the public decides how to resolve issues from local to global. DAOs can distribute governing power by involving the public directly in decision-making, without having to rely upon representatives in parliaments to enact their political will. DAOs can ensure that people can vote fairly, accessibly, and securely on issues that matter to them. 

DAOs fulfill the principle of subsidiarity in government: government governs best that governs most locally. DAOs can allow us to “Vote Globally, Act Locally” – we can all vote on global issues that affect not only our local community, but also the entire world. Once we have voted on the best proposals, we can implement the outcomes in our local communities.

A network of interconnected community DAOS can deal with global issues like climate destruction. As a metaverse governing system, this world federation of DAOs can then develop the centralized implementation organizations (CIOs) in the physical world that will implement the decisions of the DAOs. The centralized organizations can conduct the offline work, such as shifting economies from fossil fuels to sustainable energy and dramatically reducing greenhouse gas emissions. 

A linked network of community governance DAOs could be the virtual structure that we need to vote globally alongside or in place of a world parliament. Such a structure would be far less expensive to implement than the nation-states system’s current attempt to run the world, relying upon endless growth, resource depletion, national militaries, highly paid diplomats, and border controls that further aggravate the disorder and hostility among 200 separate countries.

We can maximize our technologies and resources to organize and operate our world more effectively and democratically. Even intractable issues such as equitable income and resource distribution can be implemented with token-sharing in the DAO infrastructure. Blockchain technology and DAOs can be tools to help us, while not replacing offline human interaction.

Should we be wary about using DAOs in governing?

As with any new technology or process, the public may have concerns about how DAOs could lead to unethical or unsustainable decision-making. More likely, though, wealthy individuals, corporations, and powerful national governments will be concerned about how DAOs will disrupt the institutions that maintain the status quo and the current seats of power.

Legacy government institutions will raise concerns such as: Could a DAO be used to commit bad acts? Is there a danger of DAOs putting too much decision-making power in the hands of the public who may not be well-enough informed? Who will oversee DAOs? These are legitimate concerns. And they are the same concerns that the public has about the agglomeration of power in the hands of national and corporate heads.

Unlike many national governments and corporations, DAOs have the potential to reestablish power among the people to whom government is supposed to be accountable and for whom government should exist to serve. We must ensure that governance DAOs are equitable and inclusive, providing access to everyone no matter their economic, social, or political status. Oversight of governance DAOs can be conducted by centralized adjudication organizations, such as a system of interconnected World Courts of Human and Environmental Rights.

When determining what kind of organization will help us to begin to govern our world, we should consider how our interactions with each other affect humanity and the Earth as a whole. Governance DAOs can be the organizational process that empowers the individual, and humanity, to participate and collaborate peacefully in governing the world.

What other principles for peaceful human interaction should we consider?

How does the DAO relate to the Dao?

In Chinese philosophy, the Dao is defined as the path, the natural interaction of everything in the universe, and the mathematical and scientific order of things.

Because we share the same living space with each other and other earthly beings, when we fail to govern the world, we ignore how our inaction affects our rights, our livelihood, and our future existence. In an ungoverned world, we waste time with impotent attempts to deal with global catastrophes.

We can learn from the principles of the Dao how to engage in holistic thinking that can help us to govern the world, and that can help us to comprehend how we are all interconnected as world citizens.

We need to find a path to a sustainable, peaceful, and just world.  Through governance DAOs, we may find the Dao or path to bring just and peaceful order to how humans interact with each other and the planet.  Governance DAOs can be a social tool for citizens of the world to reclaim our economic and political power. DAOs can provide a new way for humans to collaborate -- global public organizing beyond the control of nations and corporations.

Decentralized world government in the form of federated DAOs is an alternative to the nation-state system. Decentralization, in the case of DAOs, is actually democratization. With government in the hands of the people, DAOs offer verticalization of power, so that people on the bottom can go straight to the top, and then horizontalization of power so that everyone relocates to the same equitable plane. DAOs can provide a governing system that is unified and distributed, as well as just, sustainable, and ethical.

Governance through DAOs, guided by the Dao, can help us fulfill the needs and affirm the rights of the people and the planet.

Garry’s Two Gurus: Viewing the World Holistically

By David Gallup

As we enter the new year, let’s reflect on how we can strive for personal and world peace. In his own quest for personal and world peace, Garry Davis, founder of the World Citizen Government, sought advice from two gurus who helped him to navigate his role as a private individual and as a world citizen. Viewing the world holistically was what helped Garry maintain a balance between his personal life and his public activism.

In 1948, Garry became world famous after giving up his US citizenship, camping on the steps of the United Nations in Paris, and protesting the war system with thought-leaders like Albert Camus. Garry spoke to vast crowds of war-weary Europeans about creating a better world with “we, the people” in charge.

The public’s desire for peace weighed heavy on Garry’s conscience. It was not always clear to him what path he should take as a world citizen. Having realized that the world was already one when he gave up his national citizenship, he turned to Eastern and Hindu philosophy to learn the philosophical underpinnings of viewing the world in a holistic way.

A few years later, in the 1950s, Garry would meet two gurus (wisdom givers or spiritual guides), one who would help him to handle the difficulty of fame and the other who would encourage him to continue his peace activism.

Both of Garry’s gurus were experts in the philosophy of Advaita Vedanta or non-dualism, which is the primary and oldest among the schools of Indian philosophy. This holistic philosophy involves a journey to understand the source of everything and the self, as well as the relationship between the two. It posits that the core of our own being is the self in all beings. Objects, plants, animals, people, etc. may appear separate, but we are actually connected through an awareness of the oneness of everything.

Garry’s gurus taught him to look at a problem, an issue, or concern, as a consequence of the entire system in which the problem arises. By viewing the world holistically, he could see all of the intricacies of a problem -- the give and take, the polar opposites. He would then, his gurus explained, be able to transcend the problem and resolve it.

Garry’s first Guru was Harry Jakobsen in whose machine shop in New Jersey Garry worked for several months in 1952.

Garry and Harry would have long talks about holistic thinking and the state of the world. Garry was frustrated about the Korean War – frustrated that all his work to bring people together was no match for the national war machine. Garry asked Harry what he should do. Harry said, “Garry, you must continue to take action. If you see a problem in the world, you must take action to change it. If you change yourself, the world will follow. In other words, be the change you want to see in the world.”

Garry’s second Guru was Dr. Natarajan, also known as Nataraja Guru.

Garry voyaged to India to expand his learning of holistic thinking. Garry needed a break from constantly being in the spotlight, but he felt guilty for taking a break from his actions toward world peace. Garry asked Nataraja Guru about the guilt that he felt. Nataraja said to Garry, “Don’t worry, Garry. Let go. Put your mind at ease. Relax. Do nothing. The world and the universe will go on even if you are doing nothing.” This was a big solace to Garry who needed a break from the constant barrage of the press and years in the public eye.

So, Garry had two Gurus – one who told him to take action and one who told him to do nothing. They told him what they knew he needed to hear at that moment in his life. In the end, his concern for the world and humanity pulled Garry back into a life of action, continuing his role as World Citizen #1. His memoir My Country is the World and the documentary The World Is My Country recount further his experiences with the gurus.

Like his gurus before him, Garry would spend the rest of his life sharing his world citizenship wisdom. In countless speeches, conferences, seminars, newspaper and magazine articles, radio and television shows, podcasts, and his ten books, Garry advocated an ethical framework for governing our world. This holistic framework, he explained, could help us build a peaceful, just and sustainable world.

In the new year, let us seek to find repose within our minds along with the courage to build the world that Garry envisioned – a world in which humanity is united under the banner of world citizenship and world law.